Professional Legal Profile & Practice Overview: Lawyer/Civil Litigator: Rayapuram Moulaiah NaiduJurisdiction / Base: Gadwal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana StatePractice Area: High Court of Telangana, District & Regional Courts, Specialized Commissions, & Tribunals (Telangana & Andhra Pradesh)

Professional Legal Profile & Practice Overview:

Lawyer/Civil Litigator: Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu

Jurisdiction / Base: Gadwal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana State
Practice Area: High Court of Telangana, District & Regional Courts, Specialized Commissions, & Tribunals (Telangana & Andhra Pradesh)

Specialization: Civil Litigation, Public Interest Litigation (PIL), Revenue & Land Matters, Administrative Advocacy

Executive Summary:
Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu is a prominent and highly dedicated Advocate based in Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana. Renowned for his deep legal expertise and strategic advocacy, he is widely recognized as a top civil litigator across the Southern Telangana region including Jogulamba Gadwal, Wanaparthy, Mahabubnagar, and Narayanpet districts as well as adjacent regions of Andhra Pradesh.

His practice is built on a dual foundation: providing exhaustive, trial-tested legal representation in complex civil disputes, and serving the public through impactful Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and statutory commission representations.

Practice Areas & Legal Services
1. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) & Administrative Advocacy
Actively representing public welfare, constitutional rights, and systemic accountability before higher judicial forums, human rights commissions, and administrative authorities:

* Socio-Economic Development: Legal intervention for equitable development, public land protection, and community welfare.

* Environmental Protection & Conservation: Litigation against illegal mining, water body encroachments, industrial pollution, and ecological degradation.

* Anti-Corruption & Governance: Petitions demanding administrative transparency, public audit, and action against executive misfeasance.

* Educational & Cultural Rights: Safeguarding institutional standards, student welfare, and regional heritage/cultural assets.

2. Practice Forums & Statutory Commissions:
Appearing and practicing across a full range of constitutional, judicial,

quasi-judicial, and statutory bodies:
* Judicial Courts: High Court for the State of Telangana, District & Sessions Courts, Sub-Courts / Senior Civil Judge Courts, and Judicial Magistrate Courts.

* Human Rights & Oversight Bodies: National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Telangana State Human Rights Commission (SHRC), and the Institution of Lokayukta.

* Statutory Commissions: State & National Commissions for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Backward Classes (BC).

* Tribunals & Quasi-Judicial Authorities: Land Revenue Tribunals, Waqf Tribunal, Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Service Tribunals, and Appellate Authorities.

3. Civil Litigation & Property Law Expertise:
Recognized for handling intricate, high-stakes civil disputes, land ownership issues, and commercial claims:

A. Real Estate, Land & Property Disputes:

* Title & Succession: Complex chain-of-title searches, declaration of ownership, partition suits, and legal heirship/succession disputes.

* Property Registrations & Cancellation: Challenging fraudulent sale deeds, seeking cancellation of registered instruments, and rectifying defectively executed deeds.

* Agricultural & Rural Land Law: Disputes over pathway/easementary rights to agricultural lands, boundary determinations, and unregistered stamp paper validity issues.

* Adverse Possession & Injunctions: Defending and establishing rights based on long continuous possession, permanent injunctions, and temporary restraining orders.

* Unauthorized Constructions & Municipal Law: Legal action against illegal encroachments, unapproved structures, and municipal demolition notices.

B. Financial, Commercial & Recovery Suits:
* Money & Recovery Suits: Enforcement of monetary claims, debt recovery suits, and commercial litigation.

* Negotiable Instruments: Prosecuting and defending cheque bounce complaints (Section 138 NI Act) and suits based on Promissory Notes.

C. Matrimonial, Execution & Miscellaneous Matters:

* Family & Matrimonial Law: Divorce proceedings, restitution of conjugal rights, and maintenance petitions.

* Execution Petitions (EP): Execution and enforcement of court decrees, decree satisfaction, and attachment proceedings.

* Cyber Crime & Digital Law: Advising and representing victims of digital fraud, online financial crime, and cyber harassment.

* Legal Notices & Advisory: Drafting comprehensive legal notices, pre-litigation demands, counter-notices, and legal opinion reports.

Regional Footprint & Jurisdiction
| Primary District | Neighboring Telangana Districts | Bordering States / Regions |

Jogulamba Gadwal (Headquarters) | Wanaparthy | Mahabubnagar
Narayanpet | Andhra Pradesh (Kurnool & surrounding Districts)

Office Note: For legal consultation, case filing, legal opinions, or representation before statutory commissions and courts, contact the Law Office of Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu, Gadwal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana.

🎉✨ HAPPY DUSSEHRA – FESTIVAL GREETINGS & LEGAL AWARENESS ✨🎉

🌺 DUSSEHRA WISHES AND BLESSINGS TO ALL FAMILIES! 🌺

🙏 May this auspicious festival of Dussehra bring happiness, good health, peace, prosperity, and success to every family. May the victory of good over evil inspire us to stand for Truth, Justice, Equality, Human Rights, and the Rule of Law.

⚖️ OUR LEGAL SERVICES – JUSTICE FOR ALL ⚖️

🏛️ 1. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) • Social, environmental, and human rights issues
• Anti-corruption matters and public accountability
• Animal welfare and Lumpy Skin Disease (LSDV) issues affecting cattle
• Public infrastructure and district court development

📜 2. Civil & Land Litigation • Agricultural and non-agricultural land disputes
• Property, ownership, and succession matters
• Civil disputes and commercial property issues

✍️ 3. Legal Drafting & Documentation • Writ petitions before the High Court
• Legal notices, appeals, affidavits, and memorandums
• Contracts, wills, and other legal documents

⚖️ 4. Court Representation & Legal Assistance • Subordinate Courts and District Courts
• Telangana High Court
• State and Central Tribunals
• Lokayukta and Human Rights Commissions
• SC, ST, OBC, and other relevant statutory commissions

🇮🇳 OUR MISSION: JUSTICE, EQUALITY & PUBLIC SERVICE

We strive to promote access to justice, protect constitutional rights, address public-interest concerns, and provide genuine legal assistance in accordance with the law.

🌟 “Let Truth Triumph, Let Justice Prevail, and Let Every Citizen Live with Dignity.”

🌼 Wishing You and Your Family a Happy and Prosperous Dussehra! 🌼

FROM:
⚖️ Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu
Associate Lawyer & Legal Services
📍 Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana State – 509125
📞 9573436500

⚖️ JUSTICE FOR ALL | RULE OF LAW | LEGAL SUPPORT ALWAYS ⚖️

#HappyDussehra #DussehraWishes #LegalServices #PublicInterestLitigation #JusticeForAll #HumanRights #LegalAwareness #Telangana #JogulambaGadwal

NHRC Issues Strict Ultimatum to Jogulamba Gadwal SP Over Order Non-Compliance: Personal Summons Mandatory If Report Not Submitted by August 22!

NHRC Issues Strict Ultimatum to Jogulamba Gadwal SP Over Order Non-Compliance: Personal Summons Mandatory If Report Not Submitted by August 22!

NEW DELHI / GADWAL, July 17, 2026:
Taking a serious view of administrative delay and negligence of official duties, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), New Delhi, has issued a time-bound, strict final ultimatum to the Superintendent of Police (SP), Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana.

This stringent measure comes after the district police authority failed to comply with previous directions dated July 28, 2025, which mandated the submission of a comprehensive status report concerning 18 specific cases.

📌 Case Background and Details:
Case Number: 847/36/17/2026 (NHRC, New Delhi):Order Date: 15/07/2026

Cause Title: “Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu Versus the State of Telangana Rep. by the Principal Secretary for Home Govt of Telangana at Hyderabad and Others”

⚖️ “Constitutional provisions certainly protect those who have faith in them—those who constantly strive to protect constitutional values are unequivocally shielded by Constitutional Power.”

⚡ Key Directives Issued by the NHRC to Ensure Accountability:

1. Independent Investigation by the Law Division: The Commission is no longer relying solely on the local police machinery for reports. It has actively deployed its internal ‘Law Division’ (the legal department and investigative wing). The NHRC has instructed its in-house legal officers to thoroughly scrutinize Page 102 of the case file and utilize the official e-portal to independently verify the actual status of the 18 sub-judice matters.

2. Specific Clarifications Demanded from the SP: The District Superintendent of Police must explicitly furnish the following particulars in the upcoming report:

Full names and details of the complainants and the accused in the 18 specific cases.

A clear and definitive clarification on whether Lawyer Mr. Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu is listed as a complainant or an accused in these matters.

The current trial status of the cases that have already been taken cognizance of by the respective courts.

“3. Peremptory Deadlines and Strategic Steps Immediate Deadline*: The SP must furnish the initial particulars of these cases to the Commission within two weeks.

Final Deadline: The comprehensive, detailed status report must reach the NHRC headquarters on or before August 22, 2026.

⚠️ Strategic Summary & Warning of Legal Consequences (The “Or Else” Clause): By directing its Law Division to cross-reference Page 102 and the e-portal, the NHRC is executing an independent audit. The strategy ensures that by the time the District Police Authorities at Jogulamba Gadwal District submits the official report, the Commission already possesses the unvarnished facts directly from court records to detect any discrepancies or attempts to gloss over administrative delays.

The Commission has explicitly warned the district police authority that if the comprehensive report is not received by the final deadline of August 22, it will invoke its statutory civil court powers under Section 13 of the Protection of Human Rights (PHR) Act, 1993. This will result in a mandatory personal summons, legally compelling the District Police Authorities at Jogulamba Gadwal District to appear in person before the Commission in New Delhi to explain the non-compliance.

🏛️ Judicial Precedents and Constitutional Provisions:As per the landmark judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Chief Election Commissioner of India Vs. M.R. Vijayabhaskar (2021) 9 SCC 1” and “Swapnil Tripathi Vs. Supreme Court of India (2018) 10 SCC 639”, judicial proceedings and records are subject to public transparency under the principle of open justice.

Furthermore, under Section 74(1)(iii) and Section 76 of the Indian Evidence Act (I.E.A.), 1872, records, orders, and decrees of courts or tribunals are statutory Public Documents, which citizens have a right to access. This aligns with the Right to Know enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. Leveraging these established legal powers, the NHRC is taking a strict stand against administrative delays by the police.

This decisive action by the Commission marks a major milestone in ensuring administrative accountability and safeguarding the human rights of citizens.

HumanRights #NHRC #Telangana #GadwalPolice #Accountability #LegalUpdate #Justice #OpenJustice.

ఉత్తర్వుల ఉల్లంఘనపై జోగులాంబ గద్వాల జిల్లా పోలీస్ అథారిటీ కి ఎన్‌హెచ్‌ఆర్‌సీ తీవ్ర హెచ్చరిక: ఆగస్టు 22 లోగా నివేదిక ఇవ్వని యెడల వ్యక్తిగత సమన్లు తప్పవు!

ఉత్తర్వుల ఉల్లంఘనపై జోగులాంబ గద్వాల జిల్లా పోలీస్ అథారిటీ కి ఎన్‌హెచ్‌ఆర్‌సీ తీవ్ర హెచ్చరిక: ఆగస్టు 22 లోగా నివేదిక ఇవ్వని యెడల వ్యక్తిగత సమన్లు తప్పవు!

న్యూఢిల్లీ/గద్వాల, జూలై 17, 2026:
అధికారిక విధుల్లో నిర్లక్ష్యం మరియు పరిపాలనాపరమైన ఆలస్యాన్ని జాతీయ మానవ హక్కుల కమిషన్ (NHRC) తీవ్రంగా పరిగణించింది. గత ఉత్తర్వులను బేఖాతరు చేసినందుకు గాను జోగులాంబ గద్వాల జిల్లా పోలీస్ సూపరింటెండెంట్ (SP) గారికి న్యూఢిల్లీలోని ఎన్‌హెచ్‌ఆర్‌సీ కాలపరిమితితో కూడిన కఠినమైన తుది హెచ్చరికను జారీ చేసింది.

గతంలో 2025 జూలై 28 నాటి ఆదేశాల ప్రకారం 18 నిర్దిష్ట కేసులపై సమగ్ర స్థితి నివేదికను (Status Report) దాఖలు చేయడంలో జిల్లా పోలీస్ అథారిటీ విఫలం కావడంతో కమిషన్ ఈ కఠినమైన చర్యకు ఉపక్రమించింది.

📌 కేసు నేపథ్యం మరియు వివరాలు:
కేసు నంబర్: 847/36/17/2025 (NHRC, న్యూఢిల్లీ)
ఉత్తర్వు జారీ చేసిన తేదీ: 15/07/2026

కేసు శీర్షిక (Cause Title): “రాయపురం మౌలయ్య నాయుడు వర్సెస్ తెలంగాణ ప్రభుత్వం (హోం శాఖ ప్రిన్సిపల్ సెక్రటరీ ద్వారా ప్రాతినిధ్యం వహిస్తున్నది) మరియు ఇతరులు”

⚖️ “ఎవ్వరికైతే రాజ్యాంగ నిబంధనలపై నమ్మకం ఉంటుందో- ఎవ్వరైతే రాజ్యాంగ విలువలను కాపాడటానికి నిరంతరం తాపత్రయ పడుతున్నారో, అట్టి వారిని రాజ్యాంగ శక్తి (Constitutional Power) ఖచ్చితంగా రక్షిస్తుంది.”

⚡ జవాబుదారీతనాన్ని నిర్ధారించడానికి ఎన్‌హెచ్‌ఆర్‌సీ జారీ చేసిన ముఖ్యమైన ఆదేశాలు:
1. లా డివిజన్ ద్వారా స్వతంత్ర విచారణ (Independent Audit)
కమిషన్ ఇకపై నివేదికల కోసం కేవలం స్థానిక పోలీసు యంత్రాంగంపై మాత్రమే ఆధారపడటం లేదు. కమిషన్ తన అంతర్గత ‘లా డివిజన్’ (న్యాయ విభాగం మరియు పరిశోధనా వింగ్) ను రంగంలోకి దించింది. కేసు ఫైల్‌లోని పేజీ నంబర్ 102ని నిశితంగా పరిశీలించి, అధికారిక ఈ-పోర్టల్ (e-portal) ఆధారంగా ఆ 18 కేసుల అసలు స్థితిని స్వయంగా తనిఖీ చేయాలని తన ఇన్-హౌస్ న్యాయవాదులను ఆదేశించింది.

2. ఎస్పీ సమాధానం చెప్పాల్సిన కీలక అంశాలు
జిల్లా పోలీస్ అథారిటీ సమర్పించబోయే నివేదికలో క్రింది వివరాలు స్పష్టంగా ఉండాలని కమిషన్ ఆదేశించింది:
సదరు 18 కేసులలోని ఫిర్యాదుదారులు మరియు నిందితుల పూర్తి వివరాలు.

ఈ కేసులలో లాయర్ శ్రీ రాయపురం మౌలయ్య నాయుడు గారు ఫిర్యాదుదారుడిగా ఉన్నారా లేదా నిందితుడిగా ఉన్నారా అనే అంశంపై స్పష్టమైన వివరణ.

సంబంధిత న్యాయస్థానాలు ఇప్పటికే విచారణలోకి (Cognizance) తీసుకున్న కేసుల ప్రస్తుత ట్రయల్ స్థితి.

3. కఠినమైన గడువులు మరియు వ్యూహాత్మక చర్యలు
తక్షణ గడువు: జిల్లా పోలీస్ అథారిటీ ఈ కేసుల ప్రాథమిక వివరాలను రెండు వారాల లోపు కమిషన్‌కు సమర్పించాలి.
తుది గడువు: పూర్తి స్థాయి సమగ్ర నివేదిక 2026 ఆగస్టు 22 వ తేదీ లేదా అంతకంటే ముందే ఎన్‌హెచ్‌ఆర్‌సీ కార్యాలయానికి చేరాలి.

⚠️ వ్యూహాత్మక సారాంశం & చట్టపరమైన చర్యల హెచ్చరిక (Or Else Clause)
లా డివిజన్‌ను రంగంలోకి దించడం ద్వారా ఎన్‌హెచ్‌ఆర్‌సీ ఒక స్వతంత్ర ఆడిట్‌ను నిర్వహిస్తోంది. జిల్లా జిల్లా పోలీస్ అథారిటీ తన నివేదికను సమర్పించే సమయానికి, పోలీసులు నిజం చెబుతున్నారా లేదా పరిపాలనాపరమైన ఆలస్యాన్ని కప్పిపుచ్చడానికి ప్రయత్నిస్తున్నారా అనేది క్రాస్-వెరిఫై చేయడానికి కమిషన్ ముందే కోర్టు రికార్డుల నుండి అసలు వాస్తవాలను తన వద్ద సిద్ధంగా ఉంచుకుంటోంది.

ఒకవేళ ఆగస్టు 22 గడువులోగా సమగ్ర నివేదిక అందకపోతే, రక్షణ మానవ హక్కుల చట్టం (PHR Act), 1993 లోని సెక్షన్

13 కింద కమిషన్ తమకున్న చట్టబద్ధమైన సివిల్ కోర్టు అధికారాలను ఉపయోగించి జిల్లా పోలీస్ అథారిటీ కి విధిగా (Mandatory) వ్యక్తిగత సమన్లు జారీ చేస్తుంది. దీనివల్ల బాధ్యతారాహిత్యానికి గాను ఎస్పీ స్వయంగా న్యూఢిల్లీలోని కమిషన్ ముందు హాజరై వివరణ ఇచ్చుకోవాల్సి ఉంటుంది.

🏛️ న్యాయపరమైన ఉదాహరణలు మరియు రాజ్యాంగ నిబంధనలు:
భారత అత్యున్నత న్యాయస్థానం (Supreme Court) తీర్పులైన “Chief Election Commissioner of India Vs. M.R. Vijayabhaskar (2021) 9 SCC 1” మరియు “Swapnil Tripathi Vs. Supreme Court of India (2018) 10 SCC 639” ల ప్రకారం కోర్టుల చర్యలు, రికార్డులు బహిరంగ పారదర్శకతకు లోబడి ఉంటాయి.

అలాగే ఇండియన్ ఎవిడెన్స్ యాక్ట్ (I.E.A.) 1872, సెక్షన్ 74(1)(iii) మరియు సెక్షన్ 76 ప్రకారం, న్యాయస్థానాలు లేదా ట్రిబ్యునళ్ల రికార్డులు, తీర్పులు లేదా ఆర్డర్లు అన్నీ చట్టబద్ధంగా పబ్లిక్ డాక్యుమెంట్స్ (Public Documents) పరిధిలోకి వస్తాయి. భారత రాజ్యాంగంలోని ఆర్టికల్ 19(1)(a) కల్పించిన సమాచార హక్కు/తెలుసుకునే హక్కు ప్రకారం ఈ వివరాలు పారదర్శకంగా ఉండాలి. ఈ చట్టబద్ధమైన అధికారాలను ఉపయోగించే ఎన్‌హెచ్‌ఆర్‌సీ ప్రస్తుతం పోలీస్ అథారిటీ జాప్యంపై కఠినంగా వ్యవహరిస్తోంది.

పాలనాపరమైన జవాబుదారీతనానికి, పౌరుల మానవ హక్కుల పరిరక్షణకు కమిషన్ తీసుకున్న ఈ నిర్ణయం ఒక కీలకమైన మైలురాయి.

#HumanRights #NHRC #Telangana #GadwalPolice #Accountability #LegalUpdate #Justice #OpenJustice

A Decade of Justice: Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu Marks 11 Years of Championing Public Interest and Civil Litigation in Telangana

It has officially been eleven successful and remarkable years since the inception of our private legal firm, marking a journey defined by unwavering dedication, integrity, and a steadfast commitment to the rule of law. What originally began as a focused, passionate legal practice has steadily evolved over the past decade into a strong, dynamic institution. Today, our firm is proudly powered by an exceptional team of senior associates and seasoned lawyers, notably driven by the valuable contributions and legal expertise of Mr. Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu, Senior Associate and Lawyer from the Jogulamba Gadwal District of Telangana State, India.

Throughout this transformative journey, our core mission has remained clear: to stand as a powerful, relentless voice for the community. Under the legal guidance and leadership of professionals like Mr. Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu, who has earned a distinct reputation as a “Man of the People” due to his passion for equal justice, our firm has consistently fought for individuals from all walks of life. We have been profoundly honored to serve the public by championing critical societal causes through landmark Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and successfully steering numerous complex representative cases that have touched and improved countless lives. Notably, our firm’s public spirit is highlighted by groundbreaking efforts, including filing India’s first-ever Public Interest Litigation against Lumpy Skin Disease to stand responsible for the massive losses faced by farmers. Celebrating 11 Years of Legal Excellence and Public Legal Service: Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu and Team Step into the 12th Year of Dedicated Service in India

As our firm successfully concludes this proud eleven-year chapter and confidently steps across the threshold into our twelfth year of practice, we reflect on our past milestones with immense pride and look to the future with renewed vigor. We stand fully prepared, highly energized, and deeply committed to continuing our mission, dedicating our legal drafting and advocacy to civil disputes, human rights protection, and welfare. We remain ready to serve as your trusted public interest litigators and civil litigators for many more years to come. We extend our deepest, most sincere gratitude to our esteemed clients, colleagues, and the community for your continued, invaluable trust, which truly remains the cornerstone of our enduring success. Thank you for standing with us.

From

Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu Senior Associate Lawyer Jogulamba Gadwal District Telangana State India. 9573436500

Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu Associate Lawyer and Firm

Mr. Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu is an associate lawyer in Jogulamba Gadwal, Telangana, known for his focus on public interest litigation (PIL) and legal drafting. He has filed multiple PILs on issues such as the Lumpy Skin Disease outbreak, the construction of the Jogulamba Gadwal District Court complex, and problems with the Dharani Portal. He is also recognized for his legal work and services to the community, which have earned him a reputation as a “Man of the People”.
Professional background

Area of practice: Specializes in public interest litigation, handling cases related to human rights, environmental issues, and corruption.

Legal services: Provides legal drafting services, including petitions, contracts, and other legal documents.

Litigation: Has filed cases in various courts, including the High Court, Lokayukta, and the National Human Rights Commission.

Location: His firm is based in Jogulamba Gadwal, Telangana.

Notable Public Interest Litigations (PILs)
Lumpy Skin Disease: Filed the first-ever PIL against the disease in India.

Gadwal District Court Complex: Initiated a PIL regarding discrepancies in the land allocation for the new court complex.

Dharani Portal: Filed a case addressing issues with the Dharani Portal.

Human Rights: Has filed complaints with the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and the Telangana State Human Rights Commission.

Championing Agrarian Rights: A Deep Dive into the Landmark NHRC Petition for Statutory Minimum Support Price (MSP) in India: Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu Senior Associate and Lawyer.

New Delhi, Dated:07-07-2026

The Indian agricultural sector, often described as the backbone of the nation’s economy, stands at a critical crossroads. In a significant public interest initiative, Mr. Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu, a dedicated under practicing in lawyer and public-spirited litigant operating out of Gadwal, Telangana, has formally approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in New Delhi.[Case No.15717/IN/2026]

Filed on behalf of millions of small, marginal, and tenant farmers across India, this comprehensive complaint and Public Interest Petition frames the ongoing agricultural distress not merely as an economic fluctuation, but as a fundamental human rights emergency.This is a matter of utmost importance that applies across of India.

The legal grievance, filed under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, presents a detailed, evidence-based argument connecting systemic market failures with the violation of constitutional guarantees.This case strikes at the heart of a nationwide crisis.

1. Re-Evaluating the Minimum Support Price (MSP)
At the core of the petition is the mathematical and legal discrepancy in how input costs are evaluated:

The Current Executive Metric ($A2 + FL$): Primarily accounts for direct out-of-pocket costs (seeds, fertilizers, labor, pesticides) plus an estimated value for family labor ($FL$).
The Swaminathan Standard ($C2$): Recommended by the National Commission on Farmers, the $C2$ metric includes comprehensive costs—adding the rental value of owned land and interest on fixed capital assets (tractors, machinery, wells).
The petitioner argues that excluding $C2$ factors undercuts the true operational liabilities of farmers, transforming seasonal agriculture into a loss-making enterprise.

$$\text{Demanded Statutory MSP} = \text{Comprehensive Cost (C2)} \times 1.5$$

2. Market Gluts, Middlemen, and Economic Exploitation
The document highlights how bumper harvests paradoxically lead to financial distress due to the lack of cold storage infrastructure and regional procurement mechanisms. In the absence of a legal floor price, private trade cartels and middlemen force primary producers into distress sales well below their out-of-pocket expenditures ($A2$).

3. Human Cost and Constitutional Violations
Drawing upon statistical trends (including the 10,786 recorded suicides in 2023 and continuing high trajectories across 2024–2025 in regional hotspots across Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Madhya Pradesh), the petition asserts that:

Article 21 (Right to Life with Dignity): The fundamental right to life includes the right to livelihood security. Forcing food producers into systemic debt and destitution violates their dignity and fundamental rights.
State Negligence: As the primary regulator of agrarian credit, licenses, and markets, administrative failure to establish a enforceable legal safety net amounts to a breach of protective duties.
4. Summary of Key Prayers Requested Before the NHRC
                      [THE THREE PILLARS OF THE ARTICLE]
                                       |
    +———————————-+———————————-+
    |                                  |                                  |
    v                                  v                                  v
1. CONSTITUTIONAL              2. ECONOMIC MECHANICS             3. HUMAN RIGHTS &
   PERSPECTIVE                    ($A2+FL$ vs. $C2$)                RESTRUCTURING
   – Art. 21 (Dignity)            – Rental value & interest         – Structural collapse vs.
   – Duty of Welfare State        – Middlemen & market gluts         market fluctuation
a. Statutory MSP Guarantee: Enact nationwide legislation granting legal status to MSP using the Swaminathan $C2 + 50\%$ formula.

b. Criminalization of Under-Price Purchases: Declare any purchase of notified agricultural commodities below the statutory MSP by private or public buyers a punishable offense.

c. 100% Universal Procurement: Mandate state-backed procurement guarantees to protect farmers during high-supply market gluts.

d. Emergency Financial Compensation: Issue recommendations to all State Governments to disburse an emergency ex-gratia relief of ₹10 Lakhs to the families of farmers who lost their lives to debt-driven suicides between 2024 and 2025.

e. Targeted Anti-Suicide & Modernization Acts: Establish specialized interventions providing immediate mental health support, targeted debt relief, precision irrigation access, and localized cold-storage infrastructure.

5. Broader Structural Reforms Advocated
Beyond emergency financial and legal relief, the law firm of Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu outlines a three-pillar framework for long-term agrarian sustainability:

Risk Reduction: Transitioning crop insurance evaluations to individual farm-level assessments rather than village-block averages to eliminate delays in payouts.
Infrastructure Investment: Allocating public capital toward decentralized cold storage, local processing units, and direct-to-consumer digital supply chains at the taluka (sub-district) level.
Technological Modernization: Equitable distribution of climate-resilient seeds and micro-irrigation tools to reduce input costs.

6. SPECIFIC HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS COVERED UNDER THE 1993 ACT: The Petitioner submits that the state’s ongoing failure to stabilize the agricultural market constitutes a direct violation of international covenants and domestic constitutional provisions:

7. Subversion of the Right to Life with Dignity (Article 21): The Right to Life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is not limited to mere animal existence. It encompasses the right to live with human dignity, which includes access to basic livelihood security. Forcing the primary producers of food into permanent debt, property attachment, and social destitution is a severe violation of Article 21.

8. Administrative Inaction as State Negligence: Because the state regulates agricultural markets, input licenses, and credit frameworks, its refusal to provide a statutory safety net while allowing predatory private pricing to continue represents a failure of its protective duties.

9. REQUISITE REFORMS FOR A MULTI-FACETED AGRICULTURAL RESET To ensure long-term market sustainability and halt the ongoing loss of life, the state must transition from temporary welfare handouts toward structural, legal, and operational reforms across three main pillars:
Risk Reduction: Building a transparent, functional, and timely crop insurance structure that evaluates damage at the individual farm level rather than the village-block level, eliminating bureaucratic delays in payout distribution.

Infrastructure Investment: Allocating public capital to establish decentralized cold-storage facilities, clean processing units, and direct-to-consumer digital and physical supply chains at the sub-district (taluka) level.
Technological Modernization: Providing small and marginal farmers with equitable access to climate-resilient seed banks, precision irrigation infrastructure, and sustainable farming technology to lower overall input dependencies.

DISCRIPTION OF THE NHRC CASE NO.15717/IN/2026 IS THAT:
This petition represents a final administrative effort to address these systemic human rights violations. Since the central machinery has failed to initiate verifiable legislative measures to safeguard the economic rights of the farming community within the stipulated timeframe as specified in the Postal Receipt No. EN54346829IN issued to the relevant department from the date of receipt of this record—the Petitioner has come forward to file this Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Hon’ble National Human Rights Commission under Articles 19, 21, and 51 of the Constitution of India.

PRAYER FOR IMMEDIATE RELIEF: In light of the facts and arguments presented above, the Complainant / Petitioner-in-Person respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Commission exercise its plenary powers under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, and issue the following recommendations to the Respondents:

Enact Statutory MSP Protections: Direct Respondent No. 1 to urgently draft and introduce a comprehensive legislative framework that grants Statutory / Legal Status to the Minimum Support Price (MSP) based strictly on the Swaminathan Commission’s $C2 + 50\%$ formula for all notified agricultural crops.

Criminalize Under-Price Purchasing: Recommend that the proposed legislation declare any purchase of notified agricultural commodities by private or public entities below the legally fixed MSP a cognizable and punishable offense.

Mandate Universal Procurement Protocols: Direct Respondent No. 1 and No. 2 to implement a 100% state-backed “buy-back” procurement guarantee during periods of high market supply, eliminating the role of predatory middlemen.

Disburse Emergency Ex-Gratia Relief: Recommend that Respondent No. 2 (all State Governments) immediately disburse an emergency financial compensation of Rs. 10 Lakhs to the next of kin of every farmer who died by suicide during the agricultural crises of 2024 and 2025.

Formulate specialized Anti-Suicide Legislation: Direct the appropriate administrative divisions to draft specialized legislation dedicated to preventing farmer suicides, focusing on targeted debt-relief, immediate mental health support, and technological modernization inside the identified high-risk regional zones.
Conclusion

By framing agrarian economic distress through the lens of human rights and constitutional law, this petition before the NHRC marks a crucial step toward legal accountability. If unaddressed at the executive level, the petitioner has indicated readiness to escalate the matter directly to the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 to enforce the fundamental right to life and livelihood for India’s farming community.

Complaint Copy of HRCnet MSP 2026Download
Posted byR Moulaiah Naidu Associates and Firm July 8, 2026
Posted in Uncategorized Tags: education, news, politics, writingLeave a commenton Championing Agrarian Rights: A Deep Dive into the Landmark NHRC Petition for Statutory Minimum Support Price (MSP) in India:

Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu Senior Associate and Lawyer.EditChampioning Agrarian Rights: A Deep Dive into the Landmark NHRC Petition for Statutory Minimum Support Price (MSP) in India: Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu Senior Associate and Lawyer.

Championing Agrarian Rights: A Deep Dive into the Landmark NHRC Petition for Statutory Minimum Support Price (MSP) in India: Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu Senior Associate and Lawyer.

The Indian agricultural sector, often described as the backbone of the nation’s economy, stands at a critical crossroads. In a significant public interest initiative, Mr. Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu, a dedicated under practicing in lawyer and public-spirited litigant operating out of Gadwal, Telangana, has formally approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in New Delhi.[Case No.15717/IN/2026]

Filed on behalf of millions of small, marginal, and tenant farmers across India, this comprehensive complaint and Public Interest Petition frames the ongoing agricultural distress not merely as an economic fluctuation, but as a fundamental human rights emergency.This is a matter of utmost importance that applies across of India.

The legal grievance, filed under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, presents a detailed, evidence-based argument connecting systemic market failures with the violation of constitutional guarantees.This case strikes at the heart of a nationwide crisis.

1. Re-Evaluating the Minimum Support Price (MSP)

At the core of the petition is the mathematical and legal discrepancy in how input costs are evaluated:

The Current Executive Metric ($A2 + FL$): Primarily accounts for direct out-of-pocket costs (seeds, fertilizers, labor, pesticides) plus an estimated value for family labor ($FL$).
The Swaminathan Standard ($C2$): Recommended by the National Commission on Farmers, the $C2$ metric includes comprehensive costs—adding the rental value of owned land and interest on fixed capital assets (tractors, machinery, wells).

The petitioner argues that excluding $C2$ factors undercuts the true operational liabilities of farmers, transforming seasonal agriculture into a loss-making enterprise.

$$\text{Demanded Statutory MSP} = \text{Comprehensive Cost (C2)} \times 1.5$$

2. Market Gluts, Middlemen, and Economic Exploitation

The document highlights how bumper harvests paradoxically lead to financial distress due to the lack of cold storage infrastructure and regional procurement mechanisms. In the absence of a legal floor price, private trade cartels and middlemen force primary producers into distress sales well below their out-of-pocket expenditures ($A2$).

3. Human Cost and Constitutional Violations

Drawing upon statistical trends (including the 10,786 recorded suicides in 2023 and continuing high trajectories across 2024–2025 in regional hotspots across Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Madhya Pradesh), the petition asserts that:

Article 21 (Right to Life with Dignity): The fundamental right to life includes the right to livelihood security. Forcing food producers into systemic debt and destitution violates their dignity and fundamental rights.
State Negligence: As the primary regulator of agrarian credit, licenses, and markets, administrative failure to establish a enforceable legal safety net amounts to a breach of protective duties.

4. Summary of Key Prayers Requested Before the NHRC

                      [THE THREE PILLARS OF THE ARTICLE]
                                       |
    +----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
    |                                  |                                  |
    v                                  v                                  v
1. CONSTITUTIONAL              2. ECONOMIC MECHANICS             3. HUMAN RIGHTS &
   PERSPECTIVE                    ($A2+FL$ vs. $C2$)                RESTRUCTURING
   - Art. 21 (Dignity)            - Rental value & interest         - Structural collapse vs.
   - Duty of Welfare State        - Middlemen & market gluts         market fluctuation

a. Statutory MSP Guarantee: Enact nationwide legislation granting legal status to MSP using the Swaminathan $C2 + 50\%$ formula.

b. Criminalization of Under-Price Purchases: Declare any purchase of notified agricultural commodities below the statutory MSP by private or public buyers a punishable offense.

c. 100% Universal Procurement: Mandate state-backed procurement guarantees to protect farmers during high-supply market gluts.

d. Emergency Financial Compensation: Issue recommendations to all State Governments to disburse an emergency ex-gratia relief of ₹10 Lakhs to the families of farmers who lost their lives to debt-driven suicides between 2024 and 2025.

e. Targeted Anti-Suicide & Modernization Acts: Establish specialized interventions providing immediate mental health support, targeted debt relief, precision irrigation access, and localized cold-storage infrastructure.

5. Broader Structural Reforms Advocated

Beyond emergency financial and legal relief, the law firm of Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu outlines a three-pillar framework for long-term agrarian sustainability:

Risk Reduction: Transitioning crop insurance evaluations to individual farm-level assessments rather than village-block averages to eliminate delays in payouts.
Infrastructure Investment: Allocating public capital toward decentralized cold storage, local processing units, and direct-to-consumer digital supply chains at the taluka (sub-district) level.
Technological Modernization: Equitable distribution of climate-resilient seeds and micro-irrigation tools to reduce input costs.
6. SPECIFIC HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS COVERED UNDER THE 1993 ACT: The Petitioner submits that the state’s ongoing failure to stabilize the agricultural market constitutes a direct violation of international covenants and domestic constitutional provisions:
7. Subversion of the Right to Life with Dignity (Article 21): The Right to Life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is not limited to mere animal existence. It encompasses the right to live with human dignity, which includes access to basic livelihood security. Forcing the primary producers of food into permanent debt, property attachment, and social destitution is a severe violation of Article 21.
8. Administrative Inaction as State Negligence: Because the state regulates agricultural markets, input licenses, and credit frameworks, its refusal to provide a statutory safety net while allowing predatory private pricing to continue represents a failure of its protective duties.
9. REQUISITE REFORMS FOR A MULTI-FACETED AGRICULTURAL RESET To ensure long-term market sustainability and halt the ongoing loss of life, the state must transition from temporary welfare handouts toward structural, legal, and operational reforms across three main pillars:

Risk Reduction: Building a transparent, functional, and timely crop insurance structure that evaluates damage at the individual farm level rather than the village-block level, eliminating bureaucratic delays in payout distribution.

Infrastructure Investment: Allocating public capital to establish decentralized cold-storage facilities, clean processing units, and direct-to-consumer digital and physical supply chains at the sub-district (taluka) level.

Technological Modernization: Providing small and marginal farmers with equitable access to climate-resilient seed banks, precision irrigation infrastructure, and sustainable farming technology to lower overall input dependencies.

DISCRIPTION OF THE NHRC CASE NO.15717/IN/2026 IS THAT:

This petition represents a final administrative effort to address these systemic human rights violations. Since the central machinery has failed to initiate verifiable legislative measures to safeguard the economic rights of the farming community within the stipulated timeframe as specified in the Postal Receipt No. EN54346829IN issued to the relevant department from the date of receipt of this record—the Petitioner has come forward to file this Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Hon’ble National Human Rights Commission under Articles 19, 21, and 51 of the Constitution of India.

PRAYER FOR IMMEDIATE RELIEF: In light of the facts and arguments presented above, the Complainant / Petitioner-in-Person respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Commission exercise its plenary powers under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, and issue the following recommendations to the Respondents:

Enact Statutory MSP Protections: Direct Respondent No. 1 to urgently draft and introduce a comprehensive legislative framework that grants Statutory / Legal Status to the Minimum Support Price (MSP) based strictly on the Swaminathan Commission’s $C2 + 50\%$ formula for all notified agricultural crops.

Criminalize Under-Price Purchasing: Recommend that the proposed legislation declare any purchase of notified agricultural commodities by private or public entities below the legally fixed MSP a cognizable and punishable offense.

Mandate Universal Procurement Protocols: Direct Respondent No. 1 and No. 2 to implement a 100% state-backed “buy-back” procurement guarantee during periods of high market supply, eliminating the role of predatory middlemen.

Disburse Emergency Ex-Gratia Relief: Recommend that Respondent No. 2 (all State Governments) immediately disburse an emergency financial compensation of Rs. 10 Lakhs to the next of kin of every farmer who died by suicide during the agricultural crises of 2024 and 2025.

Formulate specialized Anti-Suicide Legislation: Direct the appropriate administrative divisions to draft specialized legislation dedicated to preventing farmer suicides, focusing on targeted debt-relief, immediate mental health support, and technological modernization inside the identified high-risk regional zones.

Conclusion

By framing agrarian economic distress through the lens of human rights and constitutional law, this petition before the NHRC marks a crucial step toward legal accountability. If unaddressed at the executive level, the petitioner has indicated readiness to escalate the matter directly to the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 to enforce the fundamental right to life and livelihood for India’s farming community.

Complaint Copy of HRCnet MSP 2026 Download

Victims Move Telangana High Court: Demand Immediate Transfer of Mallapur(Jogulamba Gadwal District) Serial Gang-Rape and Murder Case to CB-CID.

News ReportGadwal, Jogulamba Gadwal District:Severe criticism is mounting against the local police over their handling of a horrifying case involving the serial gang-rape and murder of innocent women and minor girls in Mallapur village of Kaloor Thimmanna Doddi Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal district. Despite a case being registered against the accused nearly 90 days ago, the Investigating Officer (IO) has maintained total silence, refusing to brief the media or update the victimized families. Critics and legal experts point out that this complete lack of transparency is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s landmark guidelines outlined in the case of PUCL v. State of Maharashtra (2023).

The Brutal Modus Operandi: Unmasking the Criminal Synergy:-According to the victims’ accounts, a brutal syndicate was run by Pagunta Govindu (Former Sarpanch of Mallapur), his cousin Mekala Ramesh, and the former Sarpanch’s brothers (Mekala Narsimhulu, P. Kambaiah, P. Tholanna, and P. Gudlanna). This group would target innocent local women and minor girls, coercing them to sleep with the former Sarpanch namedPaguntaGovind S/o Late Pagunta Bajanaiah.

If any woman or minor girl refused, they were subjected to horrific torture. The perpetrators would pin the victim flat on her back, stand on her arms to immobilize her, and pull her legs backward. While she was held down, members of the gang (including Mekala Ramesh S/o Mekala Sunkppa., Mekala Narsimhulu(Pagunta Mekalodu) S/o Pagunta Bajanaiah., Pagunta Kambaiah(P.Guddenna)S/o Pagunta Bajanaiah., ., Pagunta Tholanna(P.Narsimhulu)S/o Pagunta Bajanaiah., , and P. Gudlanna (P. Thimmappa Goud S/o Pagunta Bajanaiah., ), Kurva Veeresh S/o Kurva Wachman Bheemaiah., Kurva Kistappa son-in-law late Kurva Kistappa, Daipu Gopal S/o late Daipu Muddaiah, Boya Dullaiah son-in-law of Aloor Sattenna, would repeatedly and violently stomp on her private parts and chest. This calculated torture was meant to inflict maximum agony without killing them, forcing them into submission to comply with the former Sarpanch’s demands. Once broken, the victims were subjected to horrific gang-rapes by groups of three men, rotating twice a week.

The ‘Death Notebook’ and Suspected Serial Killings: Shockingly, the accused reportedly maintained a notebook detailing calculated plans on whom to kill, when, where, and how. Operating with this sinister log, the gang allegedly raped and murdered numerous minor girls and innocent women in the area. Several deaths in and around Mallapur village that were previously brushed off as suspicious occurred without any cases being registered. The current investigation reveals a grim reality where almost every family in Mallapur village has had an innocent woman or minor girl victimized, with some minors ultimately being murdered.Furthermore, rumors are circulating that this accused individual, Pagunta Govindu’s father Pagunta Bhajanayya, is in possession of a handgun, showing that their crimes have grown completely out of control. Another serious allegation is that they have been paying monthly bribes (protection money) to the police station under whose jurisdiction they fall. It is strongly rumored that they managed to keep their crimes hidden all these days by getting the police to serve their interests and falsely frame the incident as ‘merely an illicit affair and not a gang rape.

Suspicious Deaths and Threats (Names of Victims Have Been Changed)*:The ultimate core of this case is that, unable to bear the torture inflicted by this syndicate, Mrs. Bujamma, Mrs. Buchayalla Narasamma, Mrs. Arli Narasamma, Mrs. Chenchu Anjanamma, and Mrs. Kuruva Ramulamma of Mallapuram village—along with minor girls Daipu Nagamani, Papayalla Triveni, Chinnakandla Bhavani, and a few other minor girls—were forcibly gang-raped and murdered. However, Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu exposed in a legal notice how the accused, using their political and financial clout, threatened the victims’ families and misled them into believing that these innocent women had died because of their own husbands, allowing the actual culprits to evade the law all this time.

Furthermore, there are serious allegations that government officials—specifically Patwaris (one male official, and after his transfer, another female official) who served in Mallapuram village—were also gang-raped by groups of three individuals, secretly videotaped, and blackmailed. Among these, there are strong allegations that the accused even used his own wife and his younger brother’s wife to sleep with the male Patwari, secretly filmed the entire encounter, and blackmailed him to extort over two lakh rupees. Such heinous acts committed by the accused are unprecedented anywhere in India.The honest and powerful police officer needed to confront these accused over the manner in which they committed such horrific gang-rapes and murders while evading the clutches of law has not emerged until now. Therefore, let us hope that the Telangana High Court Bench, through a Writ Petition Order, appoints a CB-CID IPS officer as the investigating officer to deliver justice to the victimized families.

Violation of Supreme Court Guidelines and BNSS, 2023: According to the Supreme Court’s latest guidelines (September 2023) on police media briefings, the police must strictly adhere to the following:

Protecting Victim Identity: The identity of the victim must be kept completely confidential.

Mandatory Disclosure of Arrests or the stage of Investigation: For public safety and accountability, the arrest details or investigation stages or bail of the accused must be properly disclosed to the media. Failing to do either revealing a victim’s name or hiding an accused’s arrest is a serious offense.

By hiding the arrest and investigation status for 90 days, the police actions raise serious legal red flags:

Illegal Detention: Keeping the status under wraps creates a legal presumption of illegal or secret custody.

Lack of Transparency: Under Section 37 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, it is the mandatory duty of the police to prominently display the names and details of arrested individuals through the Police Control Room. Withholding this information from the media violates this statutory transparency rule.

Suspicion of Bias and Corruption: Allegations are surfacing that the police are deliberately concealing the arrests to shield influential accused individuals and dilute the case. Such lapses expose the Investigating Officer (IO) to severe departmental action, criminal prosecution, and contempt of Supreme Court proceedings.

Victims Appeal to High Court: Losing faith in the local police administration, the aggrieved families have approached the Telangana High Court twice, seeking legal intervention. They have filed a petition demanding the immediate transfer of the investigation from the local police to the CB-CID to ensure a fair and unbiased inquiry.

The public and victimized families are now waiting to see how the Jogulamba Gadwal District Police administration will respond to these grave allegations and whether stringent action will be taken to deliver justice.

Victims Move Telangana High Court: Demand Immediate Transfer of Mallapur(Jogulamba Gadwal District)Serial Gang-Rape and Murder Case to CB-CID.

News Report-Gadwal,

Jogulamba Gadwal District:Severe criticism is mounting against the local police over their handling of a horrifying case involving the serial gang-rape and murder of innocent women and minor girls in Mallapur village of Kaloor Thimmanna Doddi Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal district. Despite a case being registered against the accused nearly 90 days ago, the Investigating Officer (IO) has maintained total silence, refusing to brief the media or update the victimized families. Critics and legal experts point out that this complete lack of transparency is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s landmark guidelines outlined in the case of PUCL v. State of Maharashtra (2023).

The Brutal Modus Operandi: Unmasking the Criminal SynergyAccording to the victims’ accounts, a brutal syndicate was run by Pagunta Govindu (Former Sarpanch of Mallapur), his cousin Mekala Ramesh, and the former Sarpanch’s brothers (Mekala Narsimhulu, P. Kambaiah, P. Tholanna, and P. Gudlanna). This group would target innocent local women and minor girls, coercing them to sleep with the former Sarpanch.

Suspicious Deaths and Threats (Names of Victims Have Been Changed)*:
The ultimate core of this case is that, unable to bear the torture inflicted by this syndicate, Mrs. Bujamma, Mrs. Buchayalla Narasamma, Mrs. Arli Narasamma, Mrs. Chenchu Anjanamma, and Mrs. Kuruva Ramulamma of Mallapuram village—along with minor girls Daipu Nagamani, Papayalla Triveni, Chinnakandla Bhavani, and a few other minor girls—were forcibly gang-raped and murdered. However, Rayapuram Moulaiah Naidu exposed in a legal notice how the accused, using their political and financial clout, threatened the victims’ families and misled them into believing that these innocent women had died because of their own husbands, allowing the actual culprits to evade the law all this time.

The honest and powerful police officer needed to confront these accused over the manner in which they committed such horrific gang-rapes and murders while evading the clutches of law has not emerged until now. Therefore, let us hope that the Telangana High Court Bench, through a Writ Petition Order, appoints a CB-CID IPS officer as the investigating officer to deliver justice to the victimized families.

Protecting Victim Identity: The identity of the victim must be kept completely confidential.

Mandatory Disclosure of Arrests or Investigation stages: For public safety and accountability, the arrest details of the accused must be properly disclosed to the media. Failing to do either revealing a victim’s name or hiding an accused’s arrest is a serious offense.By hiding the arrest and investigation status for 90 days, the police actions raise serious legal red flags:

Illegal Detention: Keeping the status under wraps creates a legal presumption of illegal or secret custody or investigationstages.

Lack of Transparency: Under Section 37 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, it is the mandatory duty of the police to prominently display the names and details of arrested individuals through the Police Control Room. Withholding this information from the media violates this statutory transparency rule.

Suspicion of Bias and Corruption: Allegations are surfacing that the police are deliberately concealing the arrests to shield influential accused individuals and dilute the case. Such lapses expose the Investigating Officer (IO) to severe departmental action, criminal prosecution, and contempt of Supreme Court proceedings.

బాధితులకు అందని న్యాయం.. నిందితులను కాపాడుతున్నారా? జోగులాంబ గద్వాల జిల్లాలో (ఘోరమైన అత్యాచారాలు) కేసులో సుప్రీంకోర్టు మార్గదర్శకాలను ఉల్లంఘించిన విచారణ అధికారి?

వార్తా కథనం (Part-time-Editor):

తేది 07 ఆగష్టు 2026

గద్వాల, జోగులాంబ గద్వాల జిల్లా:జోగులాంబ గద్వాల జిల్లా కాలూర్ తిమ్మన్న దొడ్డి మండలం మల్లాపూర్ గ్రామంలో సంచలనం రేపిన అమాయక మహిళలు, మైనర్ బాలికలపై గ్యాంగ్ రేప్ మరియు హత్యల ఉదంతంలో పోలీసుల తీరుపై తీవ్ర విమర్శలు వ్యక్తమవుతున్నాయి. నిందితులపై కేసు నమోదై దాదాపు 130 రోజులు గడుస్తున్నా, విచారణ అధికారి (IO) ఇప్పటివరకు అరెస్టు వివరాలు లేదా కేసులో విచారణ ఏస్థితిలో ఉందో మీడియాకు గానీ, బాధిత కుటుంబాలకు గానీ ఎలాంటి వివరాలు వెల్లడించకపోవడం పలు అనుమానాలకు తావిస్తోంది.

పోలీసుల ఈ మౌనం సుప్రీంకోర్టు ఇచ్చిన ల్యాండ్‌మార్క్ తీర్పు (PUCL v. State of Maharashtra, 2023) మార్గదర్శకాలను స్పష్టంగా ఉల్లంఘించడమేననే ఆరోపణలు వస్తున్నాయి.

అమానవీయ కోణం వెలుగుచూసిన నిందితుల క్రూరత్వం: బాధితుల కథనం ప్రకారం.. మల్లాపూర్ గ్రామానికి చెందిన మాజీ సర్పంచ్ పాగుంట గోవిందు తండ్రి పాగుంట భజనయ్య, అతని మేనమామ కొడుకు మేకల రమేష్ తండ్రి మేకల సుంకప్ప, అలాగే మాజీ సర్పంచ్ తమ్ముళ్లు:(పి.మేకలోడు) పాగుంట మేకల నర్సింహులు తండ్రి పాగుంట భజనయ్య, పాగుంట కంబయ్య (పి.గుడ్డెన్న) తండ్రి పాగుంట భజనయ్య., పాగుంట తోలన్న (పి. నర్సింహులు) తండ్రి పాగుంట భజనయ్య., పాగుంట గుడ్లన్న(పాగుంట తిమ్మప్ప గౌడ్) తండ్రి పాగుంట భజనయ్య., కుర్వ వీరేష్ తండ్రి కుర్వ భీమయ్య (వాచ్ మెన్)., కుర్వ కిష్టప్ప (స్వర్గీయ కుర్వ కిష్టప్ప అల్లుడు)., దైపు గోపాల్ తండ్రి దైపు ముద్దయ్య, బోయ దుల్లయ్య (ఆలూరు సట్టెన్న అల్లుడు), మరికొందరు ఒక ముఠాగా ఏర్పడ్డారు. గ్రామంలోని అమాయక మహిళలను, మైనర్ బాలికలను మాజీ సర్పంచ్ దగ్గరకు పంపేందుకు ఈ ముఠా తీవ్ర ఒత్తిడి తెచ్చేది. ఎవరైనా లొంగకపోతే, వారిని వెల్లకిలా పడుకోబెట్టి, చేతులు, కాళ్లు కదలకుండా తొక్కిపట్టి.. జననాంగాలు, ఛాతీ భాగాలపై తీవ్రంగా ఎగిరెగిరి తంతూ చనిపోనంతవరకు చిత్రహింసలకు గురిచేసేవారని సమాచారం. ఆపై ఆ దారుణ హింస భరించలేక ఒప్పుకున్న బాధితులపై వారానికి రెండు సార్లు చొప్పున ముగ్గురేసి వ్యక్తులు గ్యాంగ్ రేప్‌కు పాల్పడేవారని బాధితులు ఆవేదన వ్యక్తం చేస్తున్నారు.

‘డెత్ నోట్ బుక్’… వరుస హత్యల కలకలం: ఈ ముఠా అంతటితో ఆగకుండా ఒక ప్రత్యేక నోట్ బుక్ మేనేజ్ చేసినట్లు తెలుస్తోంది. ఎవరిని, ఎప్పుడు, ఎక్కడ, ఎలా హతమార్చాలనే పక్కా ప్లాన్‌తో ఈ డైరీని నిర్వహించినట్లు ఆరోపణలు వస్తున్నాయి. ఈ క్రమంలోనే మల్లాపూర్ పరిసర ప్రాంతాల్లో ఎంతో మంది మైనర్ బాలికలను, మహిళలను అత్యాచారం చేసి చంపారని, మరికొందరి మరణాలు అనుమానాస్పదంగానే ఉండిపోయి ఎలాంటి కేసులు నమోదు కాలేదని స్థానికులు వాపోతున్నారు. దాదాపు గ్రామంలోని అనేక కుటుంబాలు ఈ ముఠా కారణంగా నరకయాతన అనుభవించాయని కేసు సారాంశం చెప్తోంది.అంతేకాదు పాగుంట గోవిందు తండ్రి పాగుంట భజనయ్య అనే ఈ నిందితునితో చేతి తుపాకీ ఉన్నట్లు పుకార్లు వినిపిస్తున్నాయి ఈవిధంగా వీరి నేరాలకు అదుపు లేకుండా పోయింది ఇంకో విషయం ఏమిటంటే వారి పరిధిలో ఉన్న పోలీస్ ఠాణాకు నెలసరి వసులు ఇస్తూ “కేవలం అక్రమ సంబంధం అని గ్యాంగ్ రేప్ కాదని” వారికి ఊడిగం చేస్తూ ఇన్ని రోజులు నేరాలను బయటకు రాకుండా మ్యానేజ్ చేస్తూ వచ్చారని బలమైన పుకార్లు వినిపిస్తున్నాయి.[ఇప్పుడు చెప్పండి ప్రజల్లారా ఇంత క్రూరమైన జంతువులను తయారు చేసింది ఎవ్వరూ నిందితులను కాపాడుతుంది ఎవ్వరూ ఇంతటి క్రూరమైన గ్యాంగ్ రేప్ టీం కు అండదండలు ఉన్నాయా లేదా]

*అనుమానాస్పద మరణాలు మరియు బెదిరింపులు(బాధితుల పేర్లు మార్చనైనది)*: ఈ సిండికేట్ పెట్టిన హింస భరించలేక మల్లాపురం గ్రామానికి చెందిన శ్రీమతి బుజమ్మ, శ్రీమతి బుచ్చాయల్ల నరసమ్మ, శ్రీమతి అర్లి నరసమ్మ, శ్రీమతి చెంచు అంజనమ్మ, శ్రీమతి కురువ రాములమ్మ లతో పాటు మరికొందరు మైనర్ బాలికలు దైపు నాగమణి, పాపయల్ల త్రివేణి, చిన్నకండ్ల భవాని మరికొందరు మైనర్ బాలికను బలవంతంగా గ్యాంగ్ రేప్ చేసి హత్య చేశారనేది అస్సలు కేసు యొక్క ముగింపు- అయితే నిందితులు తమకున్న రాజకీయ, ఆర్థిక బలంతో బాధితుల కుటుంబాలను బెదిరించి, ఆ అమాయక మహిళల మరణాలు వారి భర్తల వల్లే జరిగాయని నమ్మించి అసలు నిందితులు ఇన్నాళ్లూ చట్టం నుండి తప్పించుకున్నారని రాయపూరం మౌలయ్య నాయుడు లీగల్ నోటీసులో బట్టబయలు చేశారు.

నిందితుడు తన సొంత భార్యాను మరియు అతని తమ్ముడి భార్య ను పడుకోబెట్టి ఆ వ్యక్తులను మొత్తం వీడియోలు తీసి బ్లాక్మెయిల్ చేసి లక్షల రూపాయలకు వసులకు పాల్పడ్డారని బలమైన ఆరోపణలు కూడా ఉన్నాయి ఈ విధంగా నిందితులు చేసిన ఈ ఘోరమైన సంఘటనలు యావత్ భారత దేశం లో ఎక్కడ లేవు – అంత ఘోరమైన గ్యాంగ్ రేప్ లకు హత్యలకు పాల్పడి-చట్టానికి చిక్కకుండా తప్పించుకున్న విధానం గురించి నిజాయితీగా పని చేసే పవర్ ఫుల్ పోలీస్ ఆఫీసర్ ఇంతవరకు నిందితులపై పడలేదు -మరి తెలంగాణ హైకోర్టు ధర్మాసనం రిట్ పిటీషన్ ఆర్డర్ ద్వారా సిబి-సిఐడి (CB-CID IPS OFFICER) ఆఫీసర్ ను, విచారణ అధికారిగా నియమి బాధిత కుటుంబాలకు న్యాయం చేయాలని కోరుకుందాం

సుప్రీంకోర్టు గైడ్‌లైన్స్ మరియు BNSS చట్టాల ఉల్లంఘన?సుప్రీంకోర్టు సెప్టెంబర్ 2023 మార్గదర్శకాల ప్రకారం.. ఇలాంటి తీవ్ర నేరాల్లో బాధితురాలి గుర్తింపును పూర్తిగా దాచాలి, కానీ సమాజ హితం కోసం నిందితుల అరెస్ట్ వివరాలను మీడియాకు సక్రమంగా వెల్లడించాలి లేదా బాధిత కుటుంబాలకు న్యాయం కోసం భరోసా ఇవ్వడం కేసు స్థితి గురించి బాధిత కుటుంబాలకు మరియు మీడియాకు నిందితులను వివరాలు దాచడం క్రింది చట్టాల ప్రకారం నేరంగా పరిగణించబడుతుంది:

అక్రమ నిర్బంధం (Illegal Detention): నిందితులను లోపాయకారీగా కస్టడీలో ఉంచినట్లు భావించాల్సి వస్తుంది.భారతీయ నాగరిక్ సురక్షా సంహిత (BNSS, 2023) సెక్షన్ 37 ఉల్లంఘన: అరెస్ట్ లేదా కేసు విచారణ ఏస్థాయిలో ఉందో బాధిత కుటుంబాలకు న్యాయం కోసం భరోసా ఇవ్వడం లేదా నిందితుల వివరాలను పోలీస్ కంట్రోల్ రూమ్ ద్వారా బహిరంగంగా ప్రదర్శించకపోవడం పారదర్శకత లోపాన్ని సూచిస్తుంది.

కేసు నీరుగార్చే ప్రయత్నం: నిందితులకు అండగా నిలిచేందుకు లేదా అవినీతి కారణాల వల్ల పోలీసులు ఈ అరెస్టు వివరాలను లేదా కేసు విచారణ ఏస్థాయిలో ఉందో ఆ విషయాన్ని దాస్తున్నారనే అనుమానాలు వ్యక్తమవుతున్నాయి. దీనివల్ల విచారణ అధికారి కోర్టు ధిక్కరణ (Contempt of Court) చర్యలతో పాటు శాఖాపరమైన, క్రిమినల్ చర్యలను ఎదుర్కోవాల్సి ఉంటుంది.

హైకోర్టును ఆశ్రయించిన బాధితులు: స్థానిక పోలీసుల విచారణపై నమ్మకం లేకపోవడంతో బాధిత కుటుంబాలు ఇప్పటికే రెండు సార్లు తెలంగాణ హైకోర్టు ధర్మాసనాన్ని ఆశ్రయించాయి. స్థానిక పోలీసుల నుంచి ఈ కేసును తక్షణమే సిబి-సిఐడి (CB-CID) కి బదిలీ చేసి నిష్పక్షపాతంగా విచారణ జరిపించాలని బాధితులు కోర్టును అభ్యర్థించారు.

మరి ఇంతటి దారుణమైన గ్యాంగ్ రేప్ మరియు హత్యల ఉదంతంపై జోగులాంబ గద్వాల జిల్లా పోలీస్ యంత్రాంగం ఇకనైనా స్పందించి ఎలాంటి కఠిన చర్యలు తీసుకుంటుందో, బాధితులకు న్యాయం చేకూరుస్తుందో వేచి చూడాల్సి ఉంది.

లీగల్ రిప్రేజింటివ్/పిటీషనర్ తరపున

మీడియా సంప్రదింపుల కొరకు:

రాయపూరం మౌలయ్య నాయుడు లీగల్ అసోసియేట్స్/లాయర్.9573436500.